What’s the potential for Design with Dialogue as a true Community of Inquiry? How could we all co-create this together this year?
The first DwD of 2016 was convened by Peter Jones (dialogue) and Patricia Kambitsch (visual), held with a group of 20 new and continuing participants drawn to the shared inquiry into the possibility of community. The session was guided by several questions about the meaning of and stake in community.
The dialogue opened with acknowledgement and mapping of the communities we participate in, as shown in the sketched map, people placed notes in the spaces for Business, Religion, Regional, Neighborhood, Health & Fitness, Arts, Civic, Academic, and new communities such as “Value” and “Place”. Discussion in the circle revealed the differences in views of community and the level of engagement that counts to be considered a “community.”
The dialogue dived into the meaning of the Design with Dialogue community to its ongoing stakeholders. DwD has evolved from 2008 to today into a deeply connected, ongoing Community of Practice for learning and facilitating with tools for social and organizational transformation. Our central question for the evening was essentially, who are we a community and why are we? Do we only support and engage with these communities outside of DwD, or is there a centre of life and practice here, a community that continues in its own purpose, even if undeclared by most of us?
What’s the potential for Design with Dialogue as a true Community of Inquiry?
A visual mapping of the dialogue was sketched live during the conversation, as people responded to the question of community as:
- Place for the power of dialogue
- Bringing groups (stakeholders) in to DwD to dialogue on an issue
- Finding meaning in discourse
- Seeds for new stories
- Getting unstuck, and “dialogue as therapy”
- Listening beyond these walls
- Developing a common language and different perspectives
The group inquiry process adapted Peter Block’s six conversations on community.Variations of the questions asked each particpants to inquire and share their experience with:
- What’s your story? What’s your commitment to the group or its purpose?
- What gift do you bring? How do you lead or form the community?
- What have you been unwilling to commit to?
- What refusal have you withheld in your community?
These expressions were shared in the whole group and mapped (to the right) in the mural.
The final process developed a core set of responsibilities that lend group wisdom toward the DwD 2016 plan for co-creation and community engagement.
Together we the potential to engage and influence thinking and action in the crucial concerns of our time. Given this potential, how might we most effectively contribute to the civic issues and policy thinking in our larger communities?